From:Holly Butler e-mail:tr0picalkitty-A-yahoo.com
Subject:RE: RE: Need reason why advertised Pacer is only 1:7 existing Date:Wed Jan 15 19:48:27 2014
Response to:19172
Well thank you. I honestly couldn't care less about any monetary value placed on the motorcycle, because it is priceless to me. It is my family history. I was just trying to do some research over the years because I had seen/heard of so few of them. I'm glad that your kids have the value/respect for you and your motorcycles. They may not be perfect in some peoples eyes, but they are perfect to the people that matter the most.

----- ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS -----
Holly....you're my kind of girl...and I mean that as a compliment. I'm leaving my bikes to my kids. A few are restored; a few are originals. One son promised to keep the one (main) bike original un-restored/running. The other son doesn't give a d**n and will sell his. My two daughters have told me "How ever it (they) comes to us we'll keep it just the way it is, keep it running, and ride it out of respect for you". Things don't always have to be perfect to be loved and considered valuable. P.S. all my children are adults now.

----- ORIGINAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS -----
There is a website claiming this organization verified that their 1964 Pacer was only 1 out of 7 in existence. Not that I wouldn't believe it, I just can't find any proof to the claims, and I try to do research before believing what someone may say. I'm assuming it's a BTU model, not a BT? Just trying to figure out if 600 BT models were made, and 50 BTU models were made, why would the advertiser selling the motorcycle not specify and provide such a limited amount of details to authenticate its rarity?

http://blog.peternappi.com/tag/harley-davidson-pacer/


The additional reason I'm asking is because I have a 64 Pacer, so I'm trying to figure out why there have only been 7 supposedly documented still in existence of his particular motorcycle.